What Hospitals Should Be Doing for Their Surgeons in October

National Spine Health Awareness Month Has Focused on Patients for Years. Hospitals Can Use October to Focus on Their Surgeons Too.
October marks National Spine Health Awareness Month, an annual campaign led by the National Spine Health Foundation to highlight the importance of spinal health, prevention, and early support. The campaign reaches patients, caregivers, and healthcare organizations with the message that spinal health is worth prioritizing before it becomes a crisis. Hospital leadership teams that participate in Spine Health Awareness Month may do so through patient education, community outreach, and clinical programming. Very few use October to turn the lens inward and ask what they are doing for the spinal health of the surgeons who work in their ORs every day.
That question is worth asking. The peer-reviewed literature suggests that surgeons carry a meaningful occupational burden involving the neck and spine, accumulated over the course of careers defined by prolonged forward head flexion, loupe and headlight dependence, and long operative cases. According to Epstein et al., JAMA Surgery, which examined 5,828 physicians across 21 studies, pooled pain prevalence estimates among surgeons ranged from approximately thirty-five to sixty percent depending on the instrument used, and the prevalence of degenerative cervical spine disease in this population increased by a reported eighteen-point-three percent between 1997 and 2015. National Spine Health Awareness Month is a natural calendar anchor for hospital leadership to evaluate what they are doing, or could be doing, to address that burden systematically. If your hospital has not yet started that conversation, contact the NekSpine team through our contact page to discuss what a structured evaluation for your surgical department could look like.
Why the Surgical Workforce Is a Spine Health Priority Hospitals Have Tended to Overlook
The Occupational Pattern the Evidence Describes
Hospital ergonomics programs have grown significantly over the past decade, with most of that growth concentrated among nursing, patient transport, and support staff populations, where physical demands are evident and regulatory frameworks for intervention are established. Surgeons have been largely absent from that expansion, partly because the culture of surgical training has historically treated physical endurance as a professional expectation and partly because actionable intervention tools have only recently become available. The peer-reviewed evidence that surgical musculoskeletal strain is an occupational health concern worth a systematic institutional response has been building for years. According to a PMC worldwide MSD meta-analysis examining musculoskeletal disorder prevalence across surgical specialties, neck pain prevalence among surgeons was approximately 41% for open surgery practitioners and 45% for robotic-assisted surgery practitioners. According to a ScienceDirect PRISMA-compliant systematic review, loupe use, neck flexion greater than 30 degrees, and open surgery were associated with cervical dysfunction among surgeons across multiple studies.
These figures do not suggest that every surgeon who experiences neck discomfort will develop a career-limiting condition. They do suggest that the occupational pattern is widespread enough to warrant the same institutional attention as other physically demanding hospital roles. October provides a natural, externally validated occasion for hospital leadership to initiate or advance that conversation internally. Our clinical evidence page provides the peer-reviewed evidence base in one place for use in internal program justification, and our hospital pilot execution kit provides the framework for evaluating an ergonomic intervention at the department level.
What Hospitals Can Do During Spine Health Awareness Month That Goes Beyond Patient Education

Four Practical Actions OR Leadership Can Take in October
Hospital leadership teams looking for ways to use October meaningfully for their surgical staff have a range of options, from low-effort awareness activities to more substantive program development. Four actions that represent increasing levels of commitment are worth considering:
- Acknowledge the occupational spine health burden in surgical staff through internal communications during October, using the peer-reviewed evidence to frame the conversation as an institutional concern rather than an individual wellness matter
- Schedule a needs assessment conversation with surgical department chiefs to identify which specialties and procedure types carry the highest ergonomic exposure, using the existing literature as a starting framework
- Request an institutional evaluation of intraoperative ergonomic support options, including a review of the peer-reviewed evidence for available interventions and a discussion of pilot program structure
- Initiate a hospital pilot program for a single surgical service using a structured framework that defines the evaluation criteria, measurement approach, and decision pathway before the first surgeon begins the trial
Any of these actions can be initiated during October and framed internally as part of the hospital’s participation in National Spine Health Awareness Month. Each represents a more concrete institutional response than patient-focused programming alone. Contact our team via our contact page to discuss what a structured evaluation for your hospital looks like and how we can support the process.
How NekSpine Fits the Spine Health Awareness Month Conversation
An Intervention With a Peer-Reviewed Evidence Base for Intraoperative Postural Support
NekSpine is a passive cervical support device designed to address the intraoperative forward head flexion that contributes to cervical strain in surgeons during operative cases. The device has been evaluated in two peer-reviewed studies. The NekSpine Mayo Clinic study, Annals of Surgery, titled “Use of an Intraoperative Head, Neck, and Back Support Device in Prolonged Surgery,” evaluated outcomes across twelve surgeons in six surgical specialties during actual operative procedures and reported a fifty-six percent increase in static endurance time, a forty-one point seven percent reduction in neck and shoulder discomfort at forty-five degrees of flexion, and a ninety-one point seven percent device acceptance rate. The study also reported that the device minimally interfered with the surgeons’ ability to perform surgery and did not compromise range of motion. A second study, the University of Alberta / EWI Works, Sensors, evaluated the device using electromyography and reported up to a 31% reduction in neck muscle activity at moderate flexion angles during tasks that mimic surgical demands.
These peer-reviewed outcomes are the appropriate basis for an institutional evaluation of NekSpine as an intraoperative ergonomic intervention. They support a structured hospital pilot rather than a blanket adoption claim, and they can help OR leadership, risk management, and procurement make an evidence-based evaluation decision. Our clinical evidence page provides both full study texts, and our hospital pilot execution kit supports the structured evaluation process. Contact our team through our contact page to request the kit or schedule a hospital pilot conversation in time for Spine Health Awareness Month this October.
October Is an Opportunity for Hospitals to Demonstrate That Spine Health Applies to Everyone in the Building, Including the Surgeons in the OR.
The National Spine Health Foundation frames Spine Health Awareness Month as a time to focus on prevention, education, and support for everyone. Hospital leadership teams that extend that framing to include their surgical staff, backed by a peer-reviewed evidence base and a structured evaluation pathway, use October to build something more durable than a patient education campaign. They build the institutional infrastructure for a proactive surgical ergonomics program that may support the hospital’s workforce sustainability goals beyond October and across all surgical departments in the building. Contact our team through our contact page to begin that conversation, or review the clinical evidence supporting the evaluation decision on our clinical evidence page and explore our hospital pilot framework on our hospital pilot execution kit page.

